4.5 Article

Series of novel lanthanide complexes with a ladder-shaped 1-D double chain: Preparation, structures and photophysical properties

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2021.120278

关键词

Crystal; Dysprosium; Gadolinium; Samarium; Lanthanide

资金

  1. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, CAS [20180008]
  2. NSF of Jiangxi Province [20202BAB204003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel lanthanide complexes were synthesized and characterized, showing emission bands in yellow and ultraviolet region for complexes 1 and 2, and an upconversion emission band in the green region for complex 3. These emission bands are attributed to the 4f electron intrashell transitions.
Series of novel lanthanide complexes [Ln(4-carboxybenzenesulfonate)(H2O)5]nnCl (Ln = Sm (1), Gd (2), Dy (3)) have been synthesized through solvothermal reactions and the structures were characterized by single-crystal Xray diffraction. They are isostructural with a ladder-shaped one-dimensional (1-D) double chain structure. The solid-state photoluminescence measurements reveal that complexes 1 and 2 display emission bands in yellow and ultraviolet region, while complex 3 shows an upconversion emission band in the green region. These emission bands are resulted from the characteristic emissions of the 4f electron intrashell transition of the 4G5/2 -* 6HJ (J = 5/2, 7/2, 9/2; Sm(III) ions in 1), 6P5/2 -* 8S7/2 (Gd(III) ions in 2) and 4F9/2 -* 6H13/2 (Dy(III) ions in 3). Complexes 1 and 3 possess CIE (Commission Internationale de I??Eclairage) chromaticity coordinates of (0.518, 0.4806) and (0.3318, 0.6483), respectively. The CCT (Correlated Color Temperature) are 2415 K and 5609 K for complexes 1 and 3. The solid-state UV/visible diffuse reflectance spectra reveal that complexes 1, 2 and 3 have optical band gaps of 1.5 eV, 4.6 eV and 3.3 eV, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据