4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Complex coacervation of pea protein isolate and tragacanth gum: Comparative study with commercial polysaccharides

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102641

关键词

Pea protein isolate; Tragacanth gum; Complex coacervates; Protein-polysaccharide interaction; Zeta potential; Solubility

资金

  1. INNOV'IA (La Rochelle, France)
  2. IDCAPS (La Rochelle, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the ability of pea protein isolates to form complex coacervates with tragacanth gum was investigated. The results showed that tragacanth gum could be used as an alternative to gum arabic for forming complex coacervates with pea protein isolates based on zeta potential measurements and coacervation yield studies. The specificity of the microparticle surface formed during the spray-drying process was observed to be protein-dependent, indicating a potential application in food and pharmaceutical industries.
The ability of pea protein isolates (PPI) to form complex coacervates with tragacanth gum was investigated. The coacervate formation was structurally compared to three other PPI-polysaccharide interaction models: arabic gum and sodium alginate (known to form coacervates with PPI) and tara gum, a galactomannan. The effects of the pH and protein/polysaccharide ratio were mainly investigated using turbidity and zeta potential measurements. Regarding the pH of soluble complex formation, the pH of complex coacervates increased with the increase in protein-anionic polysaccharide mixture ratio. SEM images revealed the ability of the spray-drying process to form spherical particles of pea protein-polysaccharide complexes. The specificity of the microparticle surface was protein-dependent. FTIR analyses of coacervates showed the electrostatic interaction between the PPI and the polysaccharides. The results showed that tragacanth gum could be used as an alternative to gum arabic to form complex coacervates with PPI based on zeta potential measurements and coacervation yield studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据