4.7 Article

A comparative analysis of knowledge acquisition performance in complex networks

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 555, 期 -, 页码 46-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.060

关键词

Knowledge acquistion; Network search; Network dynamics; Complex networks; Random walks

资金

  1. CNPq-Brazil [304026/2018-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discovery processes in network science focus on knowledge acquisition through exploring nodes. Different learning strategies can lead to the same learning performance, indicating the need to combine learning curves with other sequence features for inferring network topology.
Discovery processes have been an important topic in the network science field. The exploration of nodes can be understood as the knowledge acquisition process taking place in the network, where nodes represent concepts and edges are the semantical relationships between concepts. While some studies have analyzed the performance of the knowledge acquisition process in particular network topologies, here we performed a systematic performance analysis in well-known dynamics and topologies. Several interesting results have been found. Overall, all learning curves displayed the same learning shape, with different speed rates. We also found ambiguities in the feature space describing the learning curves, meaning that the same knowledge acquisition curve can be generated in different combinations of network topology and dynamics. A surprising example of such patterns are the learning curves obtained from random and Waxman networks: despite the very distinct characteristics in terms of global structure, several curves from different models turned out to be similar. All in all, our results suggest that different learning strategies can lead to the same learning performance. From the network reconstruction point of view, however, this means that learning curves of observed sequences should be combined with other sequence features if one aims at inferring network topology from observed sequences. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据