4.3 Article

Distributional formal semantics

期刊

INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2021.104763

关键词

Formal semantics; Distributional semantics; Compositionality; Probability; Inference; Incrementality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural language semantics aims to combine the strengths of formal and distributional approaches to meaning, but their unification has proven difficult due to their fundamentally different representational currencies. Distributional Formal Semantics integrates distributionality into a formal semantic system, providing probabilistic, distributed meaning representations that capture fundamental semantic notions and enable probabilistic inference.
Natural language semantics has recently sought to combine the complementary strengths of formal and distributional approaches to meaning. However, given the fundamentally different 'representational currency' underlying these approaches-models of the world versus linguistic co-occurrence-their unification has proven extremely difficult. Here, we define Distributional Formal Semantics, which integrates distributionality into a formal semantic system on the level of formal models. This approach offers probabilistic, distributed meaning representations that are inherently compositional, and that naturally capture fundamental semantic notions such as quantification and entailment. Furthermore, we show how the probabilistic nature of these representations allows for probabilistic inference, and how the information-theoretic notion of information (measured in Entropy and Surprisal) naturally follows from it. Finally, we illustrate how meaning representations can be derived incrementally from linguistic input using a recurrent neural network model, and how the resultant incremental semantic construction procedure intuitively captures key semantic phenomena, including negation, presupposition, and anaphoricity. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据