4.4 Article

Lactate recovery kinetics in response to high-intensity exercises

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 8, 页码 1455-1465

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3420-0

关键词

Middle-distance running; Bi-compartmental model; Lactate exchanges; Lactate removal

资金

  1. Universite Savoie Mont Blanc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate lactate recovery kinetics after high-intensity exercises. Six competitive middle-distance runners performed 500-, 1000-, and 1500-m trials at 90 % of their current maximal speed over 1500 m. Each event was followed by a passive recovery to obtain blood lactate recovery curves (BLRC). BLRC were fitted by the bi-exponential time function: La(t) = La(0) + A (1)(1-e (-gamma 1t) ) + A (2)(1-e (-gamma 2t) ), where La(0) is the blood lactate concentration at exercise completion, and gamma (1) and gamma (2) enlighten the lactate exchange ability between the previously active muscles and the blood and the overall lactate removal ability, respectively. Applications of the model provided parameters related to lactate release, removal and accumulation rates at exercise completion, and net amount of lactate released during recovery. The increase of running distance was accompanied by (1) a continuous decrease in gamma (1) (p < 0.05), (2) a primary decrease (p < 0.05) and then a stabilization of gamma (2), and (3) a constant increase in blood concentrations (p < 0.05) and whole body accumulation of lactate (p < 0.05). Estimated net lactate release, removal and accumulation rates at exercise completion, as well as the net amount of lactate released during recovery were not significantly altered by distance. Alterations of lactate exchange and removal abilities have presumably been compensated by an increase in muscle-to-blood lactate gradient and blood lactate concentrations, respectively, so that estimated lactate release, removal and accumulation rates remained almost stable as distance increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据