4.6 Article

Characterization and exposure assessment of household fine particulate matter pollution in China

期刊

INDOOR AIR
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 1391-1401

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12843

关键词

characterization; China; fine particulate matter; health risk assessment; household air pollution; personal exposure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976169]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China [8182055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that household fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution in China is severe, especially in rural areas where the HPL is higher than in urban areas. There are significant differences in PM2.5 concentrations in households across different seasons and geographic locations. Urgent measures are needed to reduce indoor pollution and protect residents' health.
Household fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution greatly impacts residents' health. To explore the current national situation of household PM2.5 pollution in China, a study was conducted based on literature published from 1998 to 2018. After extracting data from the literature in conformity with the requirements, the nationwide household-weighted mean concentration of household PM2.5 (HPL) was calculated. Subgroup analyses of spatial, geographic, and temporal differences were also done. The estimated overall HPL in China was 132.2 +/- 117.7 mu g/m(3). HPL in the rural area (164.3 +/- 104.5 mu g/m(3)) was higher than that in the urban area (123.9 +/- 122.3 mu g/m(3)). For HPLs of indoor sampling sites, the kitchen was the highest, followed by the bedroom and living room. There were significant differences of geographic distributions. The HPLs in the South were higher than the North in four seasons. The inhaled dose of household PM2.5 among school-age children differed from provinces with the highest dose up to 5.9 mu g/(kg center dot d). Countermeasures should be carried out to reduce indoor pollution and safeguard health urgently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据