4.5 Article

Stakeholder selected strategies for obesity prevention in childcare: results from a small-scale cluster randomized hybrid type III trial

期刊

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01119-x

关键词

Implementation strategies; Childcare; Obesity prevention; Implementation science; Early care and education; Nutrition

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes for Health (NIH) [K01 DK110141]
  2. National Institutes of the General Medical Sciences of the NIH [P20GM109096]
  3. Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  4. Translational Research Institute (TRI), through the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [UL1 TR003107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a small-scale implementation trial of the intervention "Together, We Inspire Smart Eating" (WISE) in the early care and education setting to improve teachers' use of evidence-based practices. Results showed that the Enhanced implementation strategy led to higher fidelity in the use of EBPs, with significant differences observed. Additionally, the Enhanced group demonstrated higher levels of Appropriateness and Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change, indicating potential for successful implementation and adoption.
Background: Together, We Inspire Smart Eating (WISE) is an intervention for the early care and education setting to support children's exposure to and intake of fruits and vegetables. WISE emphasizes 4 evidence-based practices (EBPs): (1) use of a mascot; (2) educators' role modeling; (3) positive feeding practices; and (4) hands-on exposures. The current study reports on a small-scale implementation trial aimed at improving the use of WISE EBPs by teachers. Methods: A Hybrid Type III Cluster Randomized Design compared a Basic and Enhanced implementation strategy. The Basic Strategy included training and reminders only; the Enhanced strategy was a multi-faceted package of stakeholder-selected strategies including a leadership commitment, an implementation blueprint, a local champion, an environmental reminder of the EBPs, facilitation, and tailored educational resources and incentives. All study sites were Head Starts. Sites were randomized using a balancing technique that considered site characteristics; 4 sites (20 classrooms, 39 educators, 305 children) received Enhanced support; 5 sites (18 classrooms, 36 educators, 316 children) received Basic support. RE-AIM guided the evaluation, and implementation fidelity was the primary outcome. Strategies were assessed using examination of data distributions and unadjusted comparisons (t tests) as well as general linear and mixed effects models controlling for covariates. Results: For the primary outcome of fidelity, the Enhanced group had significantly higher means for 3 of 4 EBPs. Multivariate models explained a significant portion of variance for both mascot use and hands-on exposure with a significant positive effect observed for treatment condition. The Enhanced group also had higher rates of Appropriateness and Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (as indicators of implementation and adoption, respectively). There was no significant difference between groups for indicators of Reach, Effectiveness or Maintenance. Formative interviews indicated key targets for iteration and potential mechanisms. Key events were catalogued to provide context for interpretation (e.g., 61% of classrooms with turnover). Conclusions: Findings were mixed but suggested promise for the Enhanced strategy, especially considering key events of the study. Implementation fidelity improvements occurred mainly in the last 3 months of the school year; additional time may be needed to translate to improvements in child outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据