4.5 Article

Low-Power Retentive True Single-Phase-Clocked Flip-Flop With Redundant-Precharge-Free Operation

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVLSI.2021.3061921

关键词

Transistors; Power demand; Discharges (electric); Digital systems; Robustness; Low voltage; Clocks; Flip-flop (FF); low voltage operation; low-power; redundant-precharge-free; true-single-phase-clocked (TSPC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a new energy-efficient retentive true-single-phase-clocked flip-flop, which reduces power consumption and improves energy efficiency through the use of input-aware precharge scheme and transistor-level optimization. Experimental results show significant reductions in power consumption and delay compared to conventional flip-flops under different levels of data activity and supply voltage.
As basic components, optimizing power consumption of flip-flops (FFs) can significantly reduce the power of digital systems. In this article, an energy-efficient retentive true-single-phase-clocked (TSPC) FF is proposed. With the employment of input-aware precharge scheme, the proposed TSPC FF precharges only when necessary. In addition, floating node analysis and transistor level optimization are employed to further ensure the high energy efficiency of the FF without significantly increasing the area. Postlayout simulations based on SMIC 55-nm CMOS technology show that at a supply voltage of 1.2 V, the power consumption of the proposed FF is 84.37% lower than that of conventional transmission-gate flip-flop (TGFF) at 10% data activity. The reduction rate is increased to 98.53% as the data activity goes down to 0%. When the supply voltage decreases to 0.6 V, the proposed FF consumes only 0.411 fJ/cycle at 10% data activity, which is 84.23% lower than TGFF. Measurement results of ten test chips demonstrate the great energy efficiency of the proposed FF. Furthermore, the CK-to-Q delay of the proposed FF is 26.18% lower than that of TGFF at a supply voltage of 1.2 V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据