4.7 Article

Electrified Vehicle Wheel Slip Control Using Responsiveness of Regenerative Braking

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 3208-3217

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3066095

关键词

Electric and hybrid electric vehicles; heavy commercial road vehicles; integral sliding mode control; regenerative braking; wheel slip regulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, Government of India [EDD/14 15/023/MOLE/NILE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an Integral Sliding Mode Control (ISMC) based WSR strategy to enhance braking performance of Heavy Commercial Road Vehicles (HCRVs) by utilizing the responsiveness of regenerative brakes. Experimental results demonstrate that the braking strategy incorporating regenerative braking can significantly reduce slip ratio tracking error and stopping distance.
In vehicles, wheel locking and associated instability issues can be prevented by regulating wheel brake torque during braking. In contrast with conventional vehicles, electrified vehicles have both friction and regenerative braking. Typically, pneumatic friction braking is used for Wheel Slip Regulation (WSR) in Heavy Commercial Road Vehicles (HCRVs). However, the pneumatic brake system has a lower bandwidth compared to a regenerative brake system, thereby affecting the braking performance of the HCRV during WSR application. This article proposes an Integral Sliding Mode Control (ISMC) based WSR to exploit the responsiveness of regenerative brakes during braking. The proposed control strategy was evaluated in a hardware-in-loop experimental setup. For different operating conditions, the experimental results conveyed that the proposed braking strategy incorporating regenerative braking reduced the slip ratio tracking root mean square error and stopping distance in the range of 12.13% to 72% and 2.43% to 4% respectively compared to conventional frictional braking (without regenerative braking).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据