4.8 Article

Concurrent Healthcare Data Processing and Storage Framework Using Deep-Learning in Distributed Cloud Computing Environment

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 2794-2801

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3006616

关键词

Access; concurrency; healthcare; deep learning; distributed cloud computing environment; retrieval and storage-based indexing framework (RSIF)

资金

  1. doctoral research foundation of North China University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a retrieval and storage-based indexing framework (RSIF) to enhance the concurrency of user and service provider access to cloud-stored healthcare data using deep learning for constraint classification.
Distributed cloud computing environments rely on sophisticated communication and sharing paradigms for ease of access, information processing, and analysis. The challenging characteristic of such cloud computing environments is the concurrency and access as both the service provider and end-user rely on the common sharing platform. In this article, retrieval and storage-based indexing framework (RSIF) is designed to improve the concurrency of user and service provider access to the cloud-stored healthcare data. Concurrency is achieved through replication-free and continuous indexing and time-constrained retrieval of stored information. The process of classifying the constraints for data augmentation and update is performed using deep learning for all the storage instances. Through conditional assessment, the learning process determines the approximation of indexing and ordering for storing and retrieval, respectively. This helps to reduce the time for access and retrieval concurrently, provided the process is not dependent. The simulation analysis using the metrics discontinuous indexing, replicated data, retrieval time, and cost proves the reliability of the proposed framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据