4.7 Article

Simulation and Data Analysis of the Temperature Distribution and Variation in the Permanent Shaded Region of the Moon

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3009117

关键词

Moon; Temperature distribution; Mathematical model; Solar heating; Rocks; Temperature measurement; Moon; permanent shaded region (PSR); temperature distribution; temperature variation

资金

  1. NSFC Major Project [61993144012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PSRs at the lunar poles are not directly illuminated by the sun, resulting in extremely low temperatures. The study used ray-tracing method to calculate temperature distribution and variations, with results validated against Diviner IR data.
The permanent shaded regions (PSRs) at the lunar poles receive no direct solar illumination throughout the year, so their temperatures are extremely low. The PSR is mainly heated by the radiation heat flow and the scattered solar radiation from the sunlit crater wall. The temperature distribution in the PSR and its diurnal and seasonal variations have been calculated using the ray-tracing method, which determines the radiation heat flow and the scattered solar radiation. In this article, the radiation heat flows were calculated by anisotropic emissivity of the PSR, and the scattered solar radiation was calculated using the lunar Lambert model. To conform to the Diviner IR temperature data, the 1-D heat conduction equation was solved with modified heat conductivity (an important parameter of the regolith media). As an example, the daytime and nighttime temperatures in the Hermite-A crater at the North Pole during summer and winter were numerically simulated and were compared with the Diviner IR data. In addition, rocks near the central peak of the crater in the PSR may enhance the nighttime temperature. This was validated by the PSR images captured by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC), the Miniature Radio Frequency instrument data on the LRO, and the numerical simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据