4.7 Article

Reduced blood pressure-lowering effect of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 93-100

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw325

关键词

Renal denervation; Resistant hypertension; Sympathetic nervous system; Clinical trials

资金

  1. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims : Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RDN) has been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) in certain patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) (systolic BP [SBP] >= 140 mmHg and diastolic BP < 90 mmHg), characterized by increased vascular stiffness, is the predominant hypertensive phenotype in elderly patients. This study compared baseline characteristics and SBP change at 6 months between patients with ISH and combined systolic-diastolic hypertension (CH). Methods and results This study pooled data from 1103 patients from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. A total of 429 patients had ISH, and 674 had CH. Patients with ISH were significantly older than those with CH (66 vs. 55 years), had more type 2 diabetes mellitus (52.9 vs. 34.6%), and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (71.8 vs. 78.6 mL/min/ 1.73 m(2)); all P < 0.001. At 6 months, the SBP drop for CH patients was -18.7 +/- 23.7 mmHg compared with a reduction of -10.9 +/- 21.7 mmHg for ISH patients 27.8 mmHg, 95% confidence interval, CI, 210.5, 25.1, P, 0.001). The change in 24- h SBP at 6 months was -8.8 +/- 16.2 mmHg in patients with CH vs. -5.8 +/- 15.4 mmHg in ISH ( -3.0 mmHg, 95% CI -5.4, -0.6, P = 0.015). Presence of ISH at baseline but not age was associated with less pronounced BP changes following the procedure. The strongest predictor of office SBP reduction at 6 months was CH, followed by aldosterone antagonist use and non-use of vasodilators. Conclusion The reduction in BP among patients with ISH following RDNwas less pronounced than the reduction in patientswith CH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据