4.5 Article

An analytical solution for groundwater flow incorporating the effect of water bodies with sloping surfaces

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2021.1925675

关键词

groundwater flow; analytical solution; surface water-groundwater interaction; water surface slope; hyporheic flux

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University [FDK-201621768]
  2. National PhD Scholarship Program of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [2211/A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the interaction between groundwater systems and water bodies with sloping surfaces, deriving an analytical solution and using a numerical algorithm to investigate the impact of water surface slope on groundwater head distribution and flux between surface water and groundwater. The results show that the water surface slope plays a dominant role in surface water-groundwater interactions.
Determination of hyporheic flow between surface water and groundwater is crucial to clarify the coupled water systems' hydrological and ecological behaviour. Therefore, this study focuses on groundwater systems interacting with water bodies with sloping surfaces. A sloping stream is defined as an aquifer's boundary condition. A recharge/discharge term is incorporated into the groundwater flow equation to represent the flux between groundwater and a water body with a sloping surface. An analytical solution of the groundwater flow equation is derived for a homogeneous and isotropic aquifer of a steady-state case. Additionally, a numerical algorithm is written for comparison purposes. The effect of water surface slope on the groundwater head distribution in the horizontal plane and the flux between surface water and groundwater is investigated. The results show that the analytical solution represents the hydrodynamics of the stream-water body-aquifer system well, and the water surface slope is dominant on surface water-groundwater interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据