4.6 Article

Okur-Chung neurodevelopmental syndrome-linked CK2α variants have reduced kinase activity

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 140, 期 7, 页码 1077-1096

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02280-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSNK2A1 foundation
  2. Rare Disease Foundation microgrant
  3. National Institutes of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [1R01GM098367]
  4. CTSA [UL1-TR000157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Okur-Chung neurodevelopmental syndrome, or OCNDS, is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by intellectual disability, language deficits, and behavioral abnormalities. Researchers found that mutations in the CK2α gene in OCNDS patients lead to reduced kinase activity and abnormal localization, suggesting a potential underlying cause for the syndrome.
The Okur-Chung neurodevelopmental syndrome, or OCNDS, is a newly discovered rare neurodevelopmental disorder. It is characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, behavioral problems (hyperactivity, repetitive movements and social interaction deficits), hypotonia, epilepsy and language/verbalization deficits. OCNDS is linked to de novo mutations in CSNK2A1, that lead to missense or deletion/truncating variants in the encoded protein, the protein kinase CK2 alpha. Eighteen different missense CK2 alpha mutations have been identified to date; however, no biochemical or cell biological studies have yet been performed to clarify the functional impact of such mutations. Here, we show that 15 different missense CK2 alpha mutations lead to varying degrees of loss of kinase activity as recombinant purified proteins and when mutants are ectopically expressed in mammalian cells. We further detect changes in the phosphoproteome of three patient-derived fibroblast lines and show that the subcellular localization of CK2 alpha is altered for some of the OCNDS-linked variants and in patient-derived fibroblasts. Our data argue that reduced kinase activity and abnormal localization of CK2 alpha may underlie the OCNDS phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据