4.4 Article

Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK

期刊

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 1158-1167

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hex.13240

关键词

Bradford; COVID-19; misinformation; qualitative; vaccine hesitancy

资金

  1. Health foundation Covid-19 Award [2301201]
  2. Wellcome Trust infrastructure grant [WT101597MA]
  3. National Institute for Health Research under Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber [NIHR200166]
  4. ActEarly UK Prevention Research Partnership Consortium [MR/S037527/1]
  5. MRC [MR/S037527/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is influenced by safety concerns, negative stories, and personal knowledge. Participants who felt confused, distressed, and mistrusting about their social worlds during the pandemic were less positive about a vaccine. It is important to understand the relationship between misinformation spread and emotional reactions in order to counter vaccine hesitancy effectively.
Background COVID-19 vaccines can offer a route out of the pandemic, yet initial research suggests that many are unwilling to be vaccinated. A rise in the spread of misinformation is thought to have played a significant role in vaccine hesitancy. To maximize uptake, it is important to understand why misinformation has been able to take hold at this time and why it may pose a more significant problem within certain contexts. Objective To understand people's COVID-19 beliefs, their interactions with (mis)information during COVID-19 and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccine. Design and Participants Bradford, UK, was chosen as the study site to provide evidence to local decision makers. In-depth phone interviews were carried out with 20 people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford during Autumn 2020. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Results Participants discussed a wide range of COVID-19 misinformation they had encountered, resulting in confusion, distress and mistrust. Vaccine hesitancy could be attributed to three prominent factors: safety concerns, negative stories and personal knowledge. The more confused, distressed and mistrusting participants felt about their social worlds during the pandemic, the less positive they were about a vaccine. Conclusions COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy needs to be understood in the context of the relationship between the spread of misinformation and associated emotional reactions. Vaccine programmes should provide a focused, localized and empathetic response to counter misinformation. Patient or Public Contribution A rapid community and stakeholder engagement process was undertaken to identify COVID-19 priority topics important to Bradford citizens and decision makers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据