4.4 Article

Grading reliability of the tear film viscosity examination

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05176-2

关键词

Tear film viscosity; Tear film homeostasis; Dry eyes; Orthokeratology; Reliability

资金

  1. Chang Gung Research Proposal [CMRPG8J1091, CMRPG8K0111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic 4-grade system has excellent intra-observer reliability and good inter-observer reliability under 0.8-times playback speed. The grading system established in this study provides a promising solution for rapidly determining the level of TF viscosity.
Purpose To assess the reliability of a tear film (TF) viscosity video grading system. Methods Thirty-four dynamic TF viscosity videos were obtained by a clinically available TF analyzer and objectively sorted according to the movement speed of three arbitrary reflective light particles. A 4-grade system was constructed on a specially designed window for simultaneous comparison with the three standard videos. Two masked graders were invited to grade these videos under a randomized procedure. Observer reliabilities were determined by Spearman's correlation analysis and Bland-Altman agreement analysis. Results For this four-grade system, the intra-observer correlation was very strong in the two graders (rho = 0.96 and 0.82; both P < 0.0001). However, the inter-observer correlation showed moderate strength in normal playback speed (rho = 0.53, P = 0.002 and rho = 0.52, P = 0.003 for 1st and 2nd gradings, respectively). In slower playback videos, the inter-observer correlation of the two graders was higher (rho = 0.70 and P < 0.0001) when reduced to 0.8-times playback speed. Moreover, the 0.8-times mode was also significantly better than normal playback mode (P = 0.0204) in terms of inter-observer agreement. Conclusions The dynamic 4-grade system has an excellent intra-observer reliability and a good inter-observer reliability under 0.8-times playback speed. The grading system established in this study provides a promising solution for rapidly determining the level of TF viscosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据