4.7 Article

Annually resolved sediments in the classic Clarkia lacustrine deposits (Idaho, USA) during the middle Miocene Climate Optimum

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 916-920

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G48901.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR-1806015, EAR-1804511]
  2. NSF-Major Research Instrumentation grant [OCE-1626244]
  3. Texas A&M Research Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides detailed geological and paleoclimatological analysis of the Miocene Clarkia paleolake in northern Idaho, USA. They found that the deposition of the lake occurred approximately 15.78 million years ago, spanning around 840 years, coinciding with the end of the main phase of eruptions from the Columbia River Basalt Group during the Miocene Climate Optimum.
The world-renowned Miocene Clarkia paleolake in northern Idaho (USA) is closely associated with Columbia River Basalt Group volcanism. The flood basalt dammed a local drainage system to form the paleolake, which preserved a plant fossil Lagerstatte in its deposits. However, the precise age and temporal duration of the lake remain unsettled. We present the first unequivocal U-Pb zircon ages from interbedded volcanic ashes at the P-33 type location, constraining the deposition to 15.78 +/- 0.039 Ma. Using micro-X-ray fluorescence and petrographic and spectral analyses, we establish the annual characteristics of laminations throughout the stratigraphic profile using the distribution of elemental ratios, mineral assemblages, and grain-size structures, as well as organic and fossil contents. Consequently, the similar to 7.5-m-thick varved deposit at the type location P-33 represents similar to 840 yr of deposition, coincident with the end of the main phase of Columbia River Basalt Group eruptions during the Miocene Climate Optimum. The timing and temporal resolution of the deposit offer a unique opportunity to study climate change in unprecedented detail during global warming associated with carbon-cycle perturbations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据