4.2 Article

Sonic hedgehog expands neural stem cells in the neocortical region leading to an expanded and wrinkled neocortical surface

期刊

GENES TO CELLS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 399-410

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12847

关键词

brain morphogenesis; mouse; neocortical development; neural stem cell; neurogenesis; Sonic hedgehog

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology [JPMJCR12W2]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [16H06480]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K06773, 18K06253]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K06253, 15K06773] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An expanded and folded neocortex is characteristic of higher mammals, including humans and other primates. Shh overexpression during embryogenesis can promote the symmetric proliferative division of NSCs in the neocortical region, resulting in the expansion of the neocortex.
An expanded and folded neocortex is characteristic of higher mammals, including humans and other primates. The neocortical surface area was dramatically enlarged during the course of mammalian brain evolution from lissencephalic to gyrencephalic mammals, and this bestowed higher cognitive functions especially to primates, including humans. In this study, we generated transgenic (Tg) mice in which the expression of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) could be controlled in neural stem cells (NSCs) and neural progenitors by using the Tet-on system. Shh overexpression during embryogenesis promoted the symmetric proliferative division of NSCs in the neocortical region, leading to the expansion of lateral ventricles and tangential extension of the ventricular zone. Moreover, Shh-overexpressing Tg mice showed dramatic expansion of the neocortical surface area and exhibited a wrinkled brain when overexpression was commenced at early stages of neural development. These results indicate that Shh is able to increase the neocortical NSCs and contribute to expansion of the neocortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据