4.7 Article

Embedding reactive behavior into artifact-centric business process models

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2020.11.018

关键词

Artifact-centric business process modeling; Constraint repair; BPMN; UML; OCL; Business process execution

资金

  1. REMEDiAL project - Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad, Spain [TIN2017-87610-R]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain [2017-SGR-1749]
  3. European Research Council under the European Unions Horizon 2020 Programme through the ERC Advanced Grant WhiteMech [834228]
  4. ICT-48 2020 project TAILOR [952215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper advocates for separating constraint handling from activity specification in artifact-centric business process models, proposing an approach to automatically generate updates to repair constraint violations caused by activity execution.
In artifact-centric business process models it is usually assumed that the specification of the activities requires stating all the effects of the activity execution over the information base (i.e. over the artifacts it handles). In particular, these effects have to deal with integrity constraint enforcement to ensure a proper treatment of integrity constraints during activity execution. Manually specifying this treatment is a difficult, expensive and error-prone task, because of the inherent difficulty of getting rid of all the implication entailed by the constraints and also of the way to properly handle it. In this paper, we advocate for separating constraint handling from the specification of activities in such a way that only the effects of the activity over the artifacts have to be defined (without needing to care about the constraints). Then, we propose an approach to automatically generate an extension to the original business process model that allows identifying at run-time the additional updates that have to be applied to the information base to repair all constraint violations caused by the activity execution. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据