4.5 Article

Olfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis: comparing two different endonasal steroid application methods

期刊

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
卷 274, 期 3, 页码 1431-1435

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4341-6

关键词

Nasal cavity; Nose; Olfactory mucosa; Sinusitis; Therapy; Conventional nasal spray; Pressure-pulsed nasal inhalation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG HU441/18-1]
  2. Dresden Junior Fellowship Program (Exzellenzinitiative) of the Technische Universitat (TU) Dresden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limited olfactory improvement after topical steroid therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients might result from restricted drug access to the olfactory cleft. The aim of our study was to investigate the difference between two methods to topically administer steroids with respect to olfaction: (1) conventional nasal spray and (2) a device using pressure and vibration to distribute steroid aerosol endonasally. A prospective study was performed in patients with olfactory impairment due to chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps. While the first group used the conventional dexamethasone nasal spray, the second group used the device over a period of 12 days. Olfactory testing was done at 0, 2, and 8 weeks using Sniffin' Sticks test. A significant olfactory improvement was found after 2 weeks of treatment with either steroid (p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the different methods of steroid application. There is a significant olfactory improvement in CRS patients following topical dexamethasone therapy, but no obvious superiority of one of the two ways to administer the steroid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据