4.7 Article

Ultraviolet-induced nitric oxide removal using H2O/O2 catalyzed by Fe/TiO2: Feasibility and prospect

期刊

FUEL
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120026

关键词

NO removal; Ultraviolet-induced; Fe/TiO2; Radical

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [52000067, 51978262]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei [E2020502033]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020MS127]
  4. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC0203705, 2017YFC0210603]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Research Center of Industrial Boiler & Furnace Flue Gas Pollution Control [311202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel photo-catalytic oxidation method using UV and Fe/TiO2 catalyst was developed for efficient removal of NO from flue gas, with additional H2O2 further enhancing the removal efficiency. However, excess SO2 and gas flow rate were found to have negative impacts on the NO removal efficiency.
A novel photo-catalytic oxidation method using ultraviolet (UV) and iron-loaded titanium dioxide (Fe/TiO2) catalyst was developed to remove NO from the flue gas, by which the removal efficiency of 53.4% was achieved without extra oxidant, and the efficiencies were 79.5% and 93.6% when 2 wt% and 4 wt% H2O2 were used, respectively. Increasing temperature and O-2 concentration could facilitate the NO removal; neutral/alkaline solution and UV wavelength of 185 nm were more effective in removing NO, while the excess SO2 and gas flow rate were not conducive to remove NO. Besides, the NO removal mechanism was preliminarily speculated, in which center dot OH and O-3 were determined to be the main oxidizing species in the photolysis and photo-catalysis of H2O/O-2 , the radicals were also formed in the catalysis of photo-generated H2O2 by Fe/TiO2 , and the main removal product was identified as NO3- by ion chromatography (IC). Meanwhile, the stability and reuse of catalyst were investigated by the recycling test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据