4.6 Review

Gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH): A new key neurohormone controlling reproductive physiology and behavior

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100900

关键词

Gonadotropins; Gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH); Hypothalamus; Melatonin; Glucocorticoid; Thyroid hormone; Pituitary; Reproduction; Pubertal disorder; Reproductive dysfunction

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan [18107002, 22132004, 22227002, 20H03296]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H03296] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of novel neurohormones, including GnIH, has advanced the progress of reproductive neuroendocrinology and provided new insights into the treatment of pubertal disorders and reproductive dysfunctions.
The discovery of novel neurohormones is important for the advancement of neuroendocrinology. In early 1970s, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), a hypothalamic neuropeptide that promotes gonadotropin release, was identified to be an endogenous neurohormone in mammals. In 2000, thirty years later, another hypothalamic neuropeptide, gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH), that inhibits gonadotropin release, was found in quail. GnIH acts via GPR147 and inhibits gonadotropin release and synthesis and reproductive function in birds through actions on GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus and pituitary gonadotrophs. Later, GnIH was found in other vertebrates including humans. GnIH studies have advanced the progress of reproductive neuroendocrinology. Furthermore, recent GnIH studies have indicated that abnormal changes in GnIH expression may cause pubertal disorder and reproductive dysfunction. Here, we describe GnIH discovery and its impact on the progress of reproductive neuroendocrinology. This review also highlights advancement and perspective of GnIH studies on drug development for pubertal disorder and reproductive dysfunction. (149/150)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据