4.6 Review

Does Traceability Lead to Food Authentication? A Systematic Review from A European Perspective

期刊

FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 537-559

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2021.1923028

关键词

Food traceability; food authentication; geographical origin; food safety; food fraud

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food safety and quality have become a growing concern for consumers and the food industry. The European Union has implemented specific legislation to monitor and protect food safety and quality while preserving each country's culture, history, and economy. This review examines innovative research technologies used in Europe for food traceability and authentication from 2010 to 2018, providing information on the methods used, country of origin, food type, and level of food processing.
Food safety and quality concern increasingly both consumers and the entire food sector involved. The European Union has implemented specific legislation for food products in order to monitor food safety and quality, protecting each country's culture, history and local economy at the same time. Moreover, Europe's heritage is being enriched, by establishing quality schemes such as Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI). Europe's interest and concern regarding food safety proved also by Framework Program 5 Horizon 2020 continuous funding.Food traceability as well as food authentication constitute inseparable parts of food safety and quality. This systematic review presents innovative research technologies which are used in Europe for food traceability and authentication and published within the period 2010-2018. Moreover, information about the method used, the country of origin, the food type and the level of food process, are provided.This paper offers a new possible approach regarding the combination of the existing definitions of food traceability and authentication, as far as food provenance is concerned.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据