4.7 Article

Antiaging compounds from marine organisms

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110313

关键词

Antiaging; Marine organisms; Anti-photoaging; Bioactive compound; Nutraceutical functional food

资金

  1. Zhejiang Province Basic public welfare research project [GN21D060001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31700307, 31672674, 81771520]
  3. Opening Foundation of Guangdong Key Laboratory of Marine Materia Medica [LMM2020-2]
  4. NSF of Zhejiang Province [LZ17D060001]
  5. National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program [202010347044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine organisms have unique chemicals that have potential antiaging properties. Various components like carbohydrates, proteins, pigments, flavonoids, fatty acids, and phenols from marine organisms have been shown to have antiaging effects in experimental models involving rats, fruit flies, and nematodes. There is potential for these natural ingredients from marine organisms to be used in nutraceuticals, functional foods, and cosmetics as alternatives to synthetic ingredients for consumer wellbeing.
Marine organisms have received mounting attention in antiaging activity due to their exclusive chemicals. This review aims at revealing and discussing prospective antiaging substance from marine macroalgae, micaroalgae, invertebrate and vertebrate. The activity and mechanism of the carbohydrate, protein, pigment, flavonoids, fatty acids, phenols from marine organisms were revealed through a variety of antiaging experimental models such as rats, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. And meanwhile, the problems and prospects aspects were discussed for future research in this field. It was suggested that the antiaging functional ingredients from these marine organisms are alternative sources for synthetic ingredients that can contribute to consumer's wellbeing, as part of nutraceuticals, functional foods and cosmetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据