4.7 Article

Persistence of Yersinia enterocolitica bio-serotype 4/O:3 in a pork production chain in Minas Gerais, Brazil

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103660

关键词

Yersinia enterocolitica; Pork; PFGE; Persistence

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brasilia, DF, Brazil)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brasilia, DF, Brazil) [001]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil)
  4. Faculdade de Ciencias Farmaceuticas de Ribeirao Preto - Universidade de Sao Paulo (FCF-RB, USP, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified the persistence of a clonal Yersinia enterocolitica bio-serotype 4/O:3 in a particular pork production chain in Brazil, with isolates carrying various virulence genes and multidrug resistance related genes.
Yersinia enterocolitica bio-serotype 4/O:3 was previously identified in a pork production chain in Brazil and the obtained isolates presented high identity by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE, XbaI). For the current study, an additional 147 porcine samples (tonsils = 100, palate = 30, head meat = 17) were collected from the same pork production chain 2-years later and 14 (9.5%) tested positive for Y. enterocolitica. Isolates (n = 24, 1 to 2 per positive sample) were bio-serotype 4/O:3 and harbored virulence genes ail, inv, wbbU, virF, myfA, ystA, ymoA, hreP and sat, and the multidrug resistance related genes emrD, marC and yfhD. PFGE (XbaI) demonstrated no differences among isolates (100% similarity) and were identical to some Y. enterocolitica isolates (n = 13) obtained previously from the same pork chain. A second PFGE analysis (NotI) confirmed the high degree of similarity among isolates obtained over time, demonstrating the persistence of an apparent clonal Y. enterocolitica bio-serotype 4/O:3 in this particular pork production chain in Brazil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据