4.7 Article

Quality attributes optimization of orange juice subjected to multi-frequency thermosonication: Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spore inactivation and applied spectroscopy ROS characterization

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 361, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130108

关键词

ROS; Multi-frequencies; FT-IR; A; acidoterrestris; Spectral characterization

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD040090301, 2016YFD040070504]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Anhui [18030701152]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801561]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the use of multifrequency ultrasound technology can effectively inactivate AAT vegetative cells and spores in orange juice without negatively impacting its quality. Additionally, the production of ROS was found to have an inverse relationship with AAT inactivation.
This is the first time to investigate the synergistic inactivation effect and mechanism of multifrequency ultrasound (MTUS) on A. acidoterrestris (AAT) vegetative cells and spores, nutrients and enzymes of orange juice. The optimized results of MTUS (using Box Behnken design- surface response methodology) and further comparison with different mode of ultrasound (mono-and multi-frequency) revealed that 20/40 kHz, 24 min and 64 degrees C were the best optimum results. The AAT spores and vegetative cells were inactivated by 2 and 4 logs, respectively, without deteriorating orange juice contents. In addition, AAT inactivation indicated an inversely proportional relationship with ROS production. FT-IR and UV-Vis spectroscopy characterization confirmed the existence of ROS in treated orange juice and LF-NMR analysis confirmed the inactivation of AAT spores. The findings illustrated the successfully used dual-frequency ultrasound technology for fruit beverages, promoting beneficial changes in physical properties without any significant effects on the quality of ascorbic acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据