4.7 Article

Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) phenolics mitigated protein glycoxidation and formation of advanced glycation end-products: A mechanistic investigation

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 361, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130102

关键词

Myrica rubra; Phenolic compounds; Advanced glycation end-products; Maillard reaction; Dicarbonyls

资金

  1. State key research and development plan [2019YFC1605000]
  2. Open Project of Wenzhou Characteristic Food Resources Engineering Technology Research Center [ZD202003-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the inhibition of Chinese bayberry phenolics on AGEs formation, revealing that they can reduce the formation of AGEs and protect proteins from damage. Chinese bayberry fruits, especially the Biqi and Wuzi cultivars, may be a promising dietary strategy to mitigate AGEs load in the human body.
Protein glycation and formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) impose threats to the human health. This study firstly investigated the inhibition of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) phenolics on AGEs formation through mechanistic analysis. Four common Chinese bayberry cultivars were selected to prepare phenolic-rich extracts (CBEs) and characterized for phenolic composition, and their anti-AGE properties were evaluated in multiple in vitro systems. Total sixteen phenolics were quantified in CBEs by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. CBEs reduced total and specific fluorescent AGEs formation in various simulating models, and protected the protein from structural modification, oxidation, and cross-linking. Mechanistic analysis unveiled that scavenging of free radicals, inactivation of transition metals, interaction with protein to form complexes, and trapping of reactive alpha-dicarbonyls to form adducts underlain the mechanisms of the anti-glycative actions of CBEs. Chinese bayberry fruits, especially the cultivars Biqi and Wuzi, may be a promising dietary strategy to mitigate AGEs load in the human body.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据