4.7 Article

Identification of acrolein as the reactive carbonyl responsible for the formation of 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx)

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128478

关键词

Carbonyl-amine reactions; Food carbonylome; Heterocyclic aromatic amines; Lipid oxidation; Maillard reaction; Reactive carbonyls

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (MCIU) from Spain
  2. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) from Spain
  3. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) from the European Union [RTI2018-096632-B-100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reaction of acrolein and creatinine was found to produce MeIQx without the need for additional reactants. A reaction pathway explaining the formation of MeIQx and other heterocyclic aromatic amines with the structure of quinoxaline was proposed. The presence of reactive carbonyls in foods was demonstrated to play a key role in the formation of HAAs.
Reaction mixtures of reactive carbonyls and creatinine were submitted to high temperature and studied to identify the reactive carbonyl(s) responsible for 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx) formation. MeIQx was produced by reaction of acrolein and creatinine within a wide pH range and with an activation energy of 81.1 +/- 1.4 kJ/mol. No additional reactants were required, although methylglyoxal, ammonia, and formaldehyde also participated in the reaction. Nevertheless, these additional reactants were produced in situ from either acrolein or creatinine. A reaction pathway that both explains the formation of MeIQx and is valid for the formation of other heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) with the structure of quinoxaline is proposed. Obtained results demonstrate the key role of reactive carbonyls present in foods (the food carbonylome) on HAA formation. Because creatinine is ubiquitous in proteinaceous foods, the control of the food carbonylome seems to be the key point to control HAA formation in foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据