4.7 Article

Histamine detection in fish samples based on indirect competitive ELISA method using iron-cobalt co-doped carbon dots labeled histamine antibody

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128812

关键词

Fe&Co co-doped CDs; Mimic enzyme; ic-ELISA; Histamine; Fish

资金

  1. Foundation from the Science and Technology Planning Project of Fujian Province, China [2016Y0064]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2018J01432]
  3. National Key R and D Program of China [2018YFD0901003]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Xiamen, China [3502Z20183031]
  5. National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship [2019xj577, 2019xj592, 2020xj089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully established an ic-ELISA method for rapid detection of histamine using the high peroxidase-like activity of iron-cobalt co-doped carbon dots, which showed accurate, sensitive, and stable results in fish samples.
Due to complex matrixes and specific reagent deficiency, the rapid detection of histamine is still a challenge to date. Based on the high peroxidase-like activity of iron-cobalt co-doped carbon dots, an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA) was established for histamine detection using the mimic enzyme labeled with histamine antibody (His-Ab). Through the competitive binding of the labeled His-Ab to solid-phase and sample antigens, histamine content was detected with a linear range of 2.5-150 mu g mL(-1). The detection limit based on 3 sigma/K was 0.50 mg kg(-1), which was much lower than those of commercial His-kit and HPLC methods. The ic-ELISA method was applied to histamine detection in fish samples with the recovery of (103.4 +/- 0.5)%, which was in accord with those of commercial His-kit and HPLC methods. The results indicated that the established ic-ELISA method was suitable for rapid detection of histamine in fish samples with high accuracy, sensitivity and stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据