4.7 Article

Chemical characterization of the polar antibacterial fraction of the ethanol extract from Rosmarinus officinalis

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128674

关键词

Rosmarinus officinalis L.; Antibacterial activity; UPLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS; Isolation and identification

资金

  1. Key projects of the Beijing Natural Sciences Foundation
  2. Beijing Municipal Education Committee [KZ201811417049]
  3. Scientific Research Common Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [KM201911417014, KM202011417014]
  4. Innovation Platform for the Development and Construction of Special Project of Key Laboratory for Tibet Plateau Phytochemistry of Qinghai Province [2019-ZJ-Y19]
  5. Beijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University [SWHX202005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The polar fraction of rosemary exhibited stronger antibacterial activity than its essential oil, making it a promising potential as a food additive.
Rosmarinus officinalis L. has been widely used as a spice to extend the shelf life of foods. Most studies in the literature indicate that its essential oil is its major antibacterial component. In this study, a polar fraction from rosemary exhibited considerably stronger antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis than its essential oil. Guided by rapid characterization of the chemical compositions based on UPLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS, further investigation resulted in the isolation and identification of sixteen compounds. Among them, two new and six known compounds were identified in rosemary for the first time. Most isolated compounds exhibited significant antibacterial activities with minimum inhibitory concentration values of 2-128 mu g/mL; however, these activities were weaker than that of the polar fraction. Thus, the polar fraction demonstrated a promising potential to serve as a food additive, as an alternative to the essential oil, because of its stronger antibacterial activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据