4.7 Article

Total lipid prediction in single intact cocoa beans by hyperspectral chemical imaging

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128663

关键词

Theobroma cacao; Hyperspectral imaging; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Chemical imaging; Total lipid quantification; Cocoa quality assessment; Cocoa nibs; Cocoa butter

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N021126/1]
  2. Innovate UK [104461]
  3. Knowledge Transfer Partnership [511110]
  4. BBSRC [BB/N021126/1, BB/N020979/2, BB/N020979/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Innovate UK [104461] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that hyperspectral imaging technology can accurately and rapidly predict fat content at the single cocoa bean level, even from scans of unshelled beans. The estimation of fat content is beneficial for the food industry in quality control and obtaining more consistent raw materials.
This work aimed to explore the possibility of predicting total fat content in whole dried cocoa beans at a single bean level using hyperspectral imaging (HSI). 170 beans randomly selected from 17 batches were individually analysed by HSI and by reference methodology for fat quantification. Both whole (i.e. in-shell) beans and shelled seeds (cotyledons) were analysed. Partial Least Square (PLS) regression models showed good performance for single shelled beans (R-2 = 0.84, external prediction error of 2.4%). For both in-shell beans a slightly lower prediction error of 4.0% and R-2 = 0.52 was achieved, but fat content estimation is still of interest given its wide range. Beans were manually segregated, demonstrating an increase by up to 6% in the fat content of sub-fractions. HSI was shown to be a valuable technique for rapid, non-contact prediction of fat content in cocoa beans even from scans of unshelled beans, enabling significant practical benefits to the food industry for quality control purposes and for obtaining a more consistent raw material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据