4.7 Article

Structural and rheological changes of texturized mung bean protein induced by feed moisture during extrusion

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128643

关键词

Extrusion; Mung bean; Secondary structure; Structural properties; Sustainable food; Texturized vegetable protein

资金

  1. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia, under Postgraduate Putra Initiative Grant Scheme [GP-IPS/2018/9619900, 9619900]
  2. Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD)
  3. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that manipulating feed moisture content during extrusion can control protein denaturation and aggregate formation, with 49.3% feed moisture leading to favourable partial denaturation and desirable qualities in the produced TMBP.
Mung bean protein isolate was texturized at different feed moisture contents (30.0, 49.3, and 60.0%) at a constant temperature (144.57 degrees C) to evaluate the changes in protein profile, solubility, thermal, structural (at secondary and tertiary levels) and rheological properties. SDS-PAGE, surface hydrophobicity, circular dichroism, FTIR spectroscopy, and fluorescence analyses revealed protein unfolding, aggregation, and structural rearrangement as a function of feed moisture content. Extrusion at 49.3% feed moisture produced texturized mung bean protein (TMBP) with favourable partial denaturation, the formation of small aggregates, improved solubility, and digestibility with strong gel forming behaviour, whereas 30.0 and 60.0% moisture content resulted in complete protein denaturation, the undesirable formation of large aggregates and weak gels. In conclusion, protein denaturation and formation of aggregates can be controlled by manipulating feed moisture content during extrusion, with 49.3% feed moisture prompting favourable partial denaturation to produce TMBP with desirable qualities for use as a vegetarian-based meat extender.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据