4.7 Article

Cytoprotection assessment against mycotoxins on HepG2 cells by extracts from Allium sativum L

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112129

关键词

Beauvericin; alpha-ZEL; beta-ZEL; Voghiera; Garlic; PDO; HepG2 cells

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-108070RB-I00ALI]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [GV 2020/020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the cytoprotection effects of Voghiera garlic extract on HepG2 cells, revealing the best cytoprotective effect when utilizing a simultaneous treatment strategy.
Cytoprotection effects of Allium sativum L garlic extract from a local garlic ecotype from Ferrara (Italy) on hepatocarcinoma cells, HepG2 cells, is presented in this study. This garlic type is known as Voghiera garlic and has been characterized as PDO (Protected designation of Origin) product. Voghiera garlic extract (VGE) was evaluated against beauvericin (BEA) and two zearalenone (ZEA) metabolites (alpha-zearalenol (alpha-ZEL) and beta-zearalenol (beta-ZEL))-induced cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells by the MTT (3-4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, over 24 h and 48 h. Direct treatment, simultaneous treatment and pre-treatment strategies at the dilution 1:16-1:00 for VGE and at the concentration range from 0.08 to 2.5 mu M for BEA and from 1.6 to 50 mu M for both alpha-ZEL and beta-ZEL were tested. Individual IC50 values were detected at all times assayed for BEA (>0.75 mu M) and VGE (dilution upper 1:8) while this was not observed for ZEA's metabolites. When simultaneous strategy of VGE + mycotoxin was tested, cytoprotection with increases of viability (upper 50%) were observed. Lastly, in pre-treatment strategy with VGE, viability of HepG2 cells was significantly protected when alpha-ZEL was tested. As a result, the greatest cytoprotective effect of VGE in HepG2 cells is obtained when simultaneous treatment strategy was performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据