4.6 Article

Association of central serous chorioretinopathy with single nucleotide polymorphisms in complement factor H gene in Iranian population

期刊

EYE
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 1061-1065

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01579-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences Grants for the ophthalmology residency program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rs3753394 polymorphism is possibly associated with CSCR in Persian ethnicity. Further study is needed to confirm the implications of this finding in clinical practice.
Objectives To investigate the association of two different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the complement factor H (CFH) gene with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) in the Iranian population. Methods This is a case-control study with 95 participants in each group who were stratified according to their various ethnical variations. Primers for rs1329428 and rs3753394 polymorphisms were synthesized. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and underwent PCR and high-resolution melt analysis. Results The frequency of tt, ct, and cc genotypes for rs1329428 polymorphism was 22 (26.5%), 46 (55.4%), and 15 (18.1%) in acute CSCR and 5 (41.7%), 5 (41.7%), and 2 (16.7%) in chronic CSCR respectively with no significant difference between case and control groups. The frequency of tt, ct, and cc genotypes for rs3753394 polymorphism was 31 (37.3%), 14 (16.9%), and 38 (45.8%) in acute CSCR and 4 (33.3%), 3 (25%), and 5 (41.7%) in chronic CSCR respectively. There was a significant difference between patients of Persian descent and controls in rs3753394 polymorphism (P = 0.00, chi-square test). There was no statistical difference in the frequency of polymorphism between acute and chronic patients (P = 0.64 and P = 0.79 respectively, chi-square test). Conclusions The rs3753394 polymorphism is probably associated with CSCR in Persian ethnicity. Further studies are required to validate the implications of this finding in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据