4.7 Article

Multi-criteria decision analysis towards robust service quality measurement

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114508

关键词

Airpor t service quality; Grey numbers; MARCOS; Multi criteria decision analysis; SWARA

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation/The Research Council (TRC) of the Sultanate of Oman, under Commissioned Research Program [TRC/CRP/MU/COVID19/20/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the importance of airports as engines for economic development, highlighting the need for quantifying and maintaining high-quality services. A case study in Spain evaluated service quality at major airports using grey multi-criteria decision analysis, revealing the critical factors like parking access and Wi-Fi connection. The proposed methodology enables clear expression of preferences and reduces subjectivity and uncertainty in decision-making, providing a model that can be applied in other studies or practical cases.
Importance: The role of airports is critical for a region in which it is viewed as an engine for the economic development. Facilities, infrastructure, information and in general the services offered by an airport represent the f uel for this engine. Evidently, customers and travelers expect standard-quality services that need to be framed and measured. Therefore, services in airports should be quantified and maintained, accordingly. Objectives: This article reports a case study for evaluating quality of services offered by five main airports located in Spain. Quality of service was modelled based on a number of factors such as convenience, comfort, courtesy of staffs, information visibility, prices, security, and transportation facilities. The grey based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was employed towards a reliable evaluation process by airport experts and to accommodate the several qualitative and conflicting evaluation factors with distinct definitions. To this end , Grey Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA-G) and grey Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS-G) methods were applied for quantifying relative weights of decision factors and rating airports, respectively. Several sensitivity analysis, simulations, and comparisons were conducted for verifying the preciseness of the revealed results. Findings: Research findings demonstrate that the proposed SWARA-G-MARCOS-G-based methodolog y (i) enables decision makers to express their preferences clearly; and (ii) attenuates the embedded subjectivit y and uncer-tai n t y within the decision-making process. In addition, they revealed that access to the parking and Wi-Fi connection are amongst the critical factors in evaluating service quality of airport. Contribution: This paper contributes to related literature in presenting a novel decision-making approach for measuring service quality of airports, validated via a real-case study. The employed interval and linguistic grey variables allow experts, in airport operations, to express their opinions with higher flexibility and comfortability. The presented model could be re-applied for other studies or practical cases as a user-friendly decision support system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据