4.4 Review

Efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: realizing the potential of maternal influenza immunization

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 649-660

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1915138

关键词

Influenza; influenza vaccines; maternal vaccination; pregnancy; preventive health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe complications following influenza infection, making them a high priority group for immunization. Current evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, with further research needed to inform policy development and implementation strategies.
Introduction: Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe complications following influenza infection compared to the general population. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy can offer direct protection to pregnant women and passive immunity to infants up to 6 months of age via maternal antibodies. Pregnant women are a high priority group for influenza immunization. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the basis for recommending influenza vaccine to pregnant women, current immunization policies, the evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of maternal vaccination, and future research needed. We conducted a search of PubMed for articles describing the safety or efficacy of influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy. Published articles from inception to 17 November 2020 were reviewed. Expert opinion: Experimental and observational evidence support the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of influenza immunization during pregnancy. These data support the continued provision of inactivated influenza vaccine to pregnant women, as recommended by global immunization policies. To achieve success with maternal influenza immunization programs, further work is needed to inform policy development in low- and middle-income settings and implementation and promotion in high-income settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据