4.2 Review

Mass spectrometry in the lipid study of cancer

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 201-219

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2021.1912602

关键词

Cancer; Lipid; Mass spectrometry; Mass spectrometry imaging

资金

  1. AMED [JP20gm0910004]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18H05268]
  3. MEXT Project for promoting public utilization of advanced research infrastructure (Imaging Platform), Japan [JPMXS0410300220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the importance of mass spectrometry (MS) in studying lipid metabolism in various cancers, emphasizing its instrumental limitations and challenges. It also highlights the need for future developments in MS instruments to improve spatial resolution, mass resolution, and sensitivity for comprehensive lipid studies.
Introduction: Cancer is a heterogeneous disease that exploits various metabolic pathways to meet the demand for increased energy and structural components. Lipids are biomolecules that play essential roles as high energy sources, mediators, and structural components of biological membranes. Accumulating evidence has established that altered lipid metabolism is a hallmark of cancer. Areas covered: Mass spectrometry (MS) is a label-free analytical tool that can simultaneously identify and quantify hundreds of analytes. To date, comprehensive lipid studies exclusively rely on this technique. Here, we reviewed the use of MS in the study of lipids in various cancers and discuss its instrumental limitations and challenges. Expert opinion: MS and MS imaging have significantly contributed to revealing altered lipid metabolism in a variety of cancers. Currently, a single MS approach cannot profile the entire lipidome because of its lack of sensitivity and specificity for all lipid classes. For the metabolic pathway investigation, lipid study requires the integration of MS with other molecular approaches. Future developments regarding the high spatial resolution, mass resolution, and sensitivity of MS instruments are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据