4.3 Review

The use of nasal allergen vs allergen exposure chambers to evaluate allergen immunotherapy

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 461-470

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1905523

关键词

Allergen immunotherapy; allergic rhinitis; environmental exposure chamber; nasal allergen challenge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the main disease-modifying treatment option for allergic rhinitis (AR) patients with persistent moderate-severe AR, when traditional pharmacotherapies are not effective. Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) and allergen exposure chamber (AEC) are translational models used to study the properties, safety, and efficacy of AIT. AECs are more effective for studying multiple participants but require specialized facilities, while NAC is a powerful tool to determine the clinical translation of basic science and animal model findings, especially as new AIT therapies and formulations are developed.
Introduction Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment option for allergic rhinitis (AR) patients with persistent moderate-severe AR for whom traditional pharmacotherapies are ineffective. The nasal allergen challenge (NAC) and allergen exposure chamber (AEC) are two translational models of AR that can be used to investigate the properties, safety, and efficacy of AIT. Areas Covered Peer-reviewed, human-centered articles utilizing AEC or NAC models to investigate AIT between 2010 and 2020 were curated from PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID Medline databases. AECs have been used to evaluate traditional subcutaneous and sublingual administrations of AIT, including cross-protective effects and different dosing regimens. More recently, the effectiveness of novel AIT formulations has been evaluated. NACs are another model used to study AIT, including using novel intralymphatic routes of administration. It is an especially powerful and versatile tool to determine if basic science and animal model findings are clinically translatable. Expert opinion The AEC and NAC models both produce clinically relevant and reproducible results. AECs are more effective for studying many participants but are limited because they require a specialized facility. As more AIT therapies and new formulations are developed over time, the versatility of the NAC will be especially useful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据