4.5 Review

Acanthamoeba Keratitis: an update on amebicidal and cysticidal drug screening methodologies and potential treatment with azole drugs

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1427-1441

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1924673

关键词

Acanthamoeba; amebicidal; antifungal; assay; azole; cell viability; cysticidal; drug screening; drugs; keratitis treatments

资金

  1. NIH [R21AI146460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis remains challenging and requires exploration of new anti-Acanthamoeba methods. Current treatment approaches are diverse, but none is universally effective. The efficacy of azole antifungal agents against Acanthamoeba keratitis needs further investigation.
Introduction: Acanthamoeba encompasses several species of free-living ameba encountered commonly throughout the environment. Unfortunately, these species of ameba can cause opportunistic infections that result in Acanthamoeba keratitis, granulomatous amebic encephalitis, and occasionally systemic infection. Areas covered: This review discusses relevant literature found through PubMed and Google scholar published as of January 2021. The review summarizes current common Acanthamoeba keratitis treatments, drug discovery methodologies available for screening potential anti-Acanthamoeba compounds, and the anti-Acanthamoeba activity of various azole antifungal agents. Expert opinion: While several biguanide and diamidine antimicrobial agents are available to clinicians to effectively treat Acanthamoeba keratitis, no singular treatment can effectively treat every Acanthamoeba keratitis case. Efforts to identify new anti-Acanthamoeba agentsassays remain largely manual and would benefit from further automation development. Additionally, the existing literature on the effectiveness of various azole antifungal agents for treating Acanthamoeba keratitis is incomplete or contradictory, suggesting the need for a systematic review of all azoles against different pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据