4.3 Review

Current and Future Options of Haemophilia A Treatments

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 1395-1402

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1908993

关键词

Hemophilia a; treatment; emicizumab; gene therapy; prophylaxis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New treatment options for hemophilia A, including innovative factor concentrates and non-factor products with extended half-life, are expected to significantly benefit patients, improve bleeding protection and quality of life. The development of treatment algorithms and the potential challenge to traditional therapies by new treatments remain uncertain.
Introduction: The standard treatment of hemophilia A consists of the prophylactic administration of a coagulation factor concentrate, to be administered intravenously several times a week. Newly approved factor concentrates and non-factor products reduce the frequency of injection and offer better protection against bleeding. Areas covered: New treatment options for hemophilia A are either coagulation factor concentrates based on innovative active principles extending half-life (EHL) or non-factor products allowing subcutaneous application with an extended half-life, so that their broader application only needs to be made every one to four weeks. Other new therapeutic options are still in clinical studies, such as the inhibition of TFPI (tissue factor pathway inhibitor) or small interfering mRNA molecule against antithrombin and gene therapy for hemophilia A. Expert opinion: It can be expected that patients with hemophilia will benefit significantly from the new treatment options and that the protection against bleeding and joint damage as well as the quality of life will increase. The availability of alternatives to classical replacement therapy will require the development of treatment algorithms for patients with hemophilia. It is still unclear to what extent factor substitution will be challenged by the new therapies as first-line therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据