4.5 Article

The oral microbiome and inflammation in mild cognitive impairment

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111273

关键词

Oral microbiome; Periodontal disease; Inflammation; Neuroinflammation; Mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. NIH - NIA
  2. Emory Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P50 AG025688]
  3. Robert W. Woodruff Health Science Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed a link between the oral microbiome and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), aiding in the diagnosis of MCI. Two taxa, Pasteurellacae and Lautropia mirabilis, were identified to be differentially abundant in the two groups. Although systemic inflammatory markers did not differentiate the groups, differences in cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory mediators were associated with MCI.
Inflammation and immune mechanisms are believed to play important roles in Alzheimer?s disease pathogenesis. Research supports the link between poor oral health and Alzheimer?s disease. Periodontal disease and dental caries represent the two most common infections of the oral cavity. This study focused on a precursor to Alzheimer?s disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Using 16S rRNA sequencing, we characterized and compared the oral microbiome of 68 older adults who met the criteria for MCI or were cognitively normal, then explored relationships between the oral microbiome, diagnostic markers of MCI, and blood markers of systemic inflammation. Two taxa, Pasteurellacae and Lautropia mirabilis were identified to be differentially abundant in this cohort. Although systemic inflammatory markers did not differentiate the two groups, differences in five cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory mediators were identified and had significant associations with MCI. Because inflammatory markers may reflect CNS changes, pursuing this line of research could provide opportunities for new diagnostic tools and illuminate mechanisms for prevention and mitigation of Alzheimer?s disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据