4.7 Article

Sinogram-based deep learning image reconstruction technique in abdominal CT: image quality considerations

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 8342-8353

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07952-4

关键词

Computed tomography; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Image reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sinogram-based deep learning image reconstructions were both subjectively and objectively preferred over iterative reconstruction due to improved image quality and lower noise, even in large patients. DLIR-H had the best objective scores, indicating potential for clinical use and radiation dose reduction.
Objectives To investigate the image quality and perception of a sinogram-based deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm for single-energy abdominal CT compared to standard-of-care strength of ASIR-V. Methods In this retrospective study, 50 patients (62% F; 56.74 +/- 17.05 years) underwent portal venous phase. Four reconstructions (ASIR-V at 40%, and DLIR at three strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H)) were generated. Qualitative and quantitative image quality analysis was performed on the 200 image datasets. Qualitative scores were obtained for image noise, contrast, small structure visibility, sharpness, and artifact by three blinded radiologists on a 5-point scale (1, excellent; 5, very poor). Radiologists also indicated image preference on a 3-point scale (1, most preferred; 3, least preferred). Quantitative assessment was performed by measuring image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Results DLIR had better image quality scores compared to ASIR-V. Scores on DLIR-H for noise (1.40 +/- 0.53), contrast (1.41 +/- 0.55), small structure visibility (1.51 +/- 0.61), and sharpness (1.60 +/- 0.54) were the best (p < 0.05) followed by DLIR-M (1.85 +/- 0.52, 1.66 +/- 0.57, 1.69 +/- 0.59, 1.68 +/- 0.46), DLIR-L (2.29 +/- 0.58, 1.96 +/- 0.61, 1.90 +/- 0.65, 1.86 +/- 0.46), and ASIR-V (2.86 +/- 0.67, 2.55 +/- 0.58, 2.34 +/- 0.66, 2.01 +/- 0.36). Ratings for artifacts were similar for all reconstructions (p > 0.05). DLIRs did not influence subjective textural perceptions and were preferred over ASIR-V from the beginning. All DLIRs had a higher CNR (26.38-102.30%) and lower noise (20.64-48.77%) than ASIR-V. DLIR-H had the best objective scores. Conclusion Sinogram-based deep learning image reconstructions were preferred over iterative reconstruction subjectively and objectively due to improved image quality and lower noise, even in large patients. Use in clinical routine may allow for radiation dose reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据