4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of bio-based aromatic polyketones and polyetherketones derived from divanillic acid

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110526

关键词

Divanillic acid; Polyketone; Polyetherketone; Bio-based plastic

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP 20 K06159]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, bio-based aromatic polyketones (PKs) and polyetherketones (PEKs) were synthesized using electrophilic substitution reaction. The introduction of alkoxy side-chains at the hydroxyl groups of divanillic acid prior to polymerization allowed for the successful synthesis of soluble polymers with determined chemical structures. The PKs exhibited high glass transition temperatures (T-g) and thermal stability compared to the PEKs, highlighting the importance of side-chain structures in determining properties of these materials.
Bio-based aromatic polyketones (PKs) and polyetherketones (PEKs) were synthesized by the electrophilic substitution reaction of alkoxylated divanillic acid (R-DVA) and 2,2'-dimethoxybiphenyl or diphenylether. Alkoxy side-chains were introduced at the hydroxyl groups of DVA prior to polymerization. Polymerizations were carried out in a phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5)/methanesulfonic acid (MsOH) system. DVA-based PKs and PEKs were soluble in common organic solvents including chloroform and dimethylsulfoxide, and their chemical structures were determined by H-1 and C-13 NMR. The weight-average molecular weights (M-w) of the PKs were 2.6-15.0 x 10(3) g/mol, and those of all PEKs were approximately 1.0 x 10(3). The 10% degradation temperatures of the PKs and PEKs were 340-400 degrees C. Dynamic mechanical analysis showed that the PKs and PEKs were amorphous. The PKs with methyl to butyl side-chains exhibited high glass transition temperatures (T-g) in the range 250-297 degrees C, while T-g of PK (octyl side-chain) was 157 degrees C and those of the PEKs were 73-127 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据