4.7 Article

Simplified fast detector simulation in MADANALYSIS 5

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 81, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09052-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme as part of theMarie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network MCnetITN3 [722104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new simplified fast detector simulator has been introduced in the MadAnalysis 5 platform. By comparing predictions with Delphes 3 software, the results generally agree to a level of about 10% or better, with the largest differences stemming from different strategies used to model specific detector effects. MadAnalysis 5 now offers a user-friendly way to include detector effects when analyzing collider events.
We introduce a new simplified fast detector simulator in the MadAnalysis 5 platform. The Python-like interpreter of the programme has been augmented by new commands allowing for a detector parametrisation through smearing and efficiency functions. On run time, an associated C++ code is automatically generated and executed to produce reconstructed-level events. In addition, we have extended the MadAnalysis 5 recasting infrastructure to support our detector emulator, and we provide predefined LHC detector configurations. We have compared predictions obtained with our approach to those resulting from the usage of the Delphes 3 software, both for Standard Model processes and a few new physics signals. Results generally agree to a level of about 10% or better, the largest differences in the predictions stemming from the different strategies that are followed to model specific detector effects. Equipped with these new functionalities, MadAnalysis 5 now offers a new user-friendly way to include detector effects when analysing collider events, the simulation of the detector and the analysis being both handled either through a set of intuitive Python commands or directly within the C++ core of the platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据