4.7 Review

Four decades of research on the open-shop scheduling problem to minimize the makespan

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 295, 期 2, 页码 399-426

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.026

关键词

Scheduling; Open-shop; Review; Makespan

资金

  1. UTS International Research Scholarship (IRS)
  2. UTS Faculty of Science Scholarship
  3. UTS President's Scholarship (UTSP)
  4. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award - Australian Government [DE170100234]
  5. Hong Kong Polytechnic University under the Fung Yiu KingWing Hang Bank Endowed Professorship in Business Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The open-shop scheduling problem involves scheduling jobs on different machines to optimize performance metrics. Recent research interest has been focused on the computational complexity and solution methodologies for variants of the problem.
One of the basic scheduling problems, the open-shop scheduling problem has a broad range of applications across different sectors. The problem concerns scheduling a set of jobs, each of which has a set of operations, on a set of different machines. Each machine can process at most one operation at a time and the job processing order on the machines is immaterial, i.e., it has no implication for the scheduling outcome. The aim is to determine a schedule, i.e., the completion times of the operations processed on the machines, such that a performance criterion is optimized. While research on the problem dates back to the 1970s, there have been reviving interests in the computational complexity of variants of the problem and solution methodologies in the past few years. Aiming to provide a complete road map for future research on the open-shop scheduling problem, we present an up-to-date and comprehensive review of studies on the problem that focuses on minimizing the makespan, and discuss potential research opportunities. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据