4.6 Article

A model based on routine liver tests can reliably exclude intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 66-70

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.04.022

关键词

Bile acids; Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; Liver function tests; Prediction; Pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of laboratory values (TB, ALK, GGT, AST) was shown to reliably exclude the diagnosis of ICP, particularly useful in settings with limited access to BA levels testing.
Objectives: Serum bile acid (BA) levels testing is used for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). We aimed to determine the performance of routine liver tests in the evaluation of ICP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital, including all pregnant women who underwent serum BA levels testing due to suspected ICP during 2007-2019. Liver tests were performed in all women including: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALK), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and total bilirubin (TB). The optimal combination of laboratory values was determined by an algorithm developed in the Python programming language. Results: Of 640 women who met the inclusion criteria, 22% (n = 142) were diagnosed with ICP (serum BA>10 mu mol/L). A combined laboratory score of: (TB>11 mu mol/L) or (ALK>255 U/L) or (GGT>32 U/L) or (AST>31 U/ L), had a sensitivity of 94%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 35%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.11 for the diagnosis of ICP. The AUC of the laboratory model alone was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.69-0.75). The addition of history of ICP to the suggested laboratory score resulted in a sensitivity of 97%, NPV of 98% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.06. The AUC of the final model was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79). Conclusions: A combined laboratory score incorporating AST, GGT, ALK and TB was shown to reliably exclude the diagnosis of ICP. This may be particularly useful in settings with limited access to BA levels testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据