4.5 Article

Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 1146-1157

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR2488]
  2. Department of Innovation, Research and Universities of the Province of South Tyrol
  3. NordForsk [81105]
  4. Economic and Social Research Council (United Kingdom Research and Innovation), Governance of Health Data in Cyberspace project
  5. NordForsk [81105] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recall by genotype (RbG) studies aim to understand the phenotypes corresponding to genetic variants by recruiting carriers, but ethical issues related to the disclosure of unwanted genetic information need to be addressed.
Recall by genotype (RbG) studies aim to better understand the phenotypes that correspond to genetic variants of interest, by recruiting carriers of such variants for further phenotyping. RbG approaches pose major ethical and legal challenges related to the disclosure of possibly unwanted genetic information. The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study is a longitudinal cohort study based in South Tyrol, Italy. Demand has grown for CHRIS study participants to be enrolled in RbG studies, thus making the design of a suitable ethical framework a pressing need. We here report upon the design of a pilot RbG study conducted with CHRIS study participants. By reviewing the literature and by consulting relevant stakeholders (CHRIS participants, clinical geneticists, ethics board, GPs), we identified key ethical issues in RbG approaches (e.g. complexity of the context, communication of genetic results, measures to further protect participants). The design of the pilot was based on a feasibility assessment, the selection of a suitable test case within the ProtectMove Research Unit on reduced penetrance of hereditary movement disorders, and the development of appropriate recruitment and communication strategies. An empirical study was embedded in the pilot study with the aim of understanding participants' views on RbG. Our experience with the pilot study in CHRIS allowed us to contribute to the development of best practices and policies for RbG studies by drawing recommendations: addressing the possibility of RbG in the original consent, implementing tailored communication strategies, engaging stakeholders, designing embedded empirical studies, and sharing research experiences and methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据