4.4 Article

Fifteen days of moderate normobaric hypoxia does not affect mitochondrial function, and related genes and proteins, in healthy men

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 8, 页码 2323-2336

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04706-4

关键词

Mitochondrial respiration; PGC-1 alpha; P53; LONP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that 15 days of moderate hypoxia exposure did not significantly alter mitochondrial respiration, genes, and proteins associated with mitochondrial biogenesis in young recreationally active males. However, an increase in mitochondrial protease LON content after hypoxia exposure suggests possible adaptations to optimize respiratory chain function under reduced oxygen availability.
Purpose To investigate within the one study potential molecular and cellular changes associated with mitochondrial biogenesis following 15 days of exposure to moderate hypoxia. Methods Eight males underwent a muscle biopsy before and after 15 days of hypoxia exposure -(FiO(2) = 0.140-0.154; similar to 25003200 m) in a hypoxic hotel. Mitochondrial respiration, citrate synthase (CS) activity, and the content of genes and proteins associated with mitochondrial biogenesis were investigated. Results Our main findings were the absence of significant changes in the mean values of CS activity, mitochondrial respiration in permeabilised fibers, or the content of genes and proteins associated with mitochondrial biogenesis, after 15 days of moderate normobaric hypoxia. Conclusion Our data provide evidence that 15 days of moderate normobaric hypoxia have negligible influence on skeletal muscle mitochondrial content and function, or genes and proteins content associated with mitochondrial biogenesis, in young recreationally active males. However, the increase in mitochondrial protease LON content after hypoxia exposure suggests the possibility of adaptations to optimise respiratory chain function under conditions of reduced -O-2 availability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据