4.4 Article

A novel method of mobility-based clustering protocol in software defined sensor network

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-021-01927-1

关键词

Software defined sensor network; Cluster; Node mobility; Centralization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572180, 61472467, 61471164, 61672011, 61602164]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2016JJ2012]
  3. Key Project of the Education Department of Hunan Province [20A087]
  4. Scientific Research Fund Education Department of Hunan Province of China [14b033]
  5. Innovation Platform Open Fund Project of Hunan Provincial Education Department [20K025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A centralized mobility-based clustering protocol is proposed to improve network performance in traditional wireless sensor networks, focusing on transmission success rate, power consumption, and control overhead.
The distributed clustering method is widely used to extend network lifetime in traditional wireless sensor networks. However, it is difficult to achieve the idea performance of the whole network, such as transmission rate, energy consumption, and control overhead, neglecting the global stability of the network. To tackle this problem, a centralized mobility-based clustering (CMBC) protocol is proposed in the software defined sensor network. The method of CMBC mainly consists of two aspects: first, CMBC clusters the nodes with the connection time between the mobile nodes (i.e., noncluster head nodes, non-CH) and the cluster head (CH) and establishes stable topological structures between the non-CHs and the CH; second, when emergencies occur, the centralization management control center sends the configuration files to replace the CH. Compared to the distributed network of MBC, WCRA and IMP-MECA protocol, the proposed method can be applied in scenarios with high-speed mobile nodes to improve the network performance in terms of transmission successful rate, average power consumption, and average control overhead.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据