4.5 Article

Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons

期刊

EPIGENETICS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 518-530

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970

关键词

DNA methylation; CpG density; MeDIP; RRBS; WGBS; genome; human; rat; bird; fish; methods; review

资金

  1. John Templeton Foundation [50183, 61174]
  2. NIH [ES012974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is commonly used for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment, with CpG density playing a crucial role in different molecular techniques. Observations show that most genomes have low CpG density, with MeDIP focusing on <5 CpG/100 bp regions and RRBS identifying higher CpG density areas.
Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study was designed to investigate the CpG density in a variety of different species genomes and correlate this to various DNA methylation analysis data sets. The majority of all genomes had >90% of the genome in the low density 1-3 CpG/100 bp category, while 5 CpG/100 bp category. Similar observations with human, rat, bird, and fish genomes were observed. The methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) procedure uses the anti-5-methylcytosine antibody immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-Seq). The MeDIP procedure is biased to lower CpG density of <5 CpG/100 bp, which corresponds to >95% of the genome. The reduced representation bisulphite (RRBS) protocol generally identifies DMRs in higher CpG density regions of >= 3 CpG/100 bp which corresponds to approximately 20% of the genome. The whole-genome bisulphite (WGBS) analyses resulted in higher CpG densities, often greater than 10 CpG/100bp. WGBS generally identifies >= 2 CpG/100bp, which corresponds to approximately 50% of the genome. Limitations and potential optimization approaches for each method are discussed. None of the procedures can provide complete genome-wide assessment of the genome, but MeDIP-Seq provides coverage of the highest percentage. Observations demonstrate that CpG density is a critical variable in DNA methylation analysis, and different molecular techniques focus on distinct genomic regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据